<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A historical perspective: Why are we Fat?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roundshape.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/a-historical-perspective-why-are-we-fat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roundshape.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/a-historical-perspective-why-are-we-fat/</link>
	<description>Self-Love Comes in All Shapes &#38; Sizes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:19:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A bit more Fascinating History of Fat &#171; I AM in shape. ROUND is a shape.</title>
		<link>http://roundshape.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/a-historical-perspective-why-are-we-fat/#comment-5241</link>
		<dc:creator>A bit more Fascinating History of Fat &#171; I AM in shape. ROUND is a shape.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roundshape.wordpress.com/?p=692#comment-5241</guid>
		<description>[...] by April D under Ask Questions, In the News Leave a Comment&#160;  I know I&#8217;ve already done a historical perspective on Why are we Fat: a time-line of some articles found in Science News regarding the views on fat [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by April D under Ask Questions, In the News Leave a Comment&nbsp;  I know I&#8217;ve already done a historical perspective on Why are we Fat: a time-line of some articles found in Science News regarding the views on fat [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: And then I come back with ramblings &#171; I AM in shape. ROUND is a shape.</title>
		<link>http://roundshape.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/a-historical-perspective-why-are-we-fat/#comment-5219</link>
		<dc:creator>And then I come back with ramblings &#171; I AM in shape. ROUND is a shape.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roundshape.wordpress.com/?p=692#comment-5219</guid>
		<description>[...] are DIFFERENT.  All of them.  Naturally. Made just as they are meant to be. We don&#8217;t know WHY some are fat.  They just [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are DIFFERENT.  All of them.  Naturally. Made just as they are meant to be. We don&#8217;t know WHY some are fat.  They just [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mixed Messages Matter &#8211; When Actions Speak Louder Than Words &#171; Angry Gray Rainbows</title>
		<link>http://roundshape.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/a-historical-perspective-why-are-we-fat/#comment-5114</link>
		<dc:creator>Mixed Messages Matter &#8211; When Actions Speak Louder Than Words &#171; Angry Gray Rainbows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roundshape.wordpress.com/?p=692#comment-5114</guid>
		<description>[...] includes me!), I highly recommend reading the awesomeness that April at RoundShape just wrote on why we are fat from a historical perspective.  April [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] includes me!), I highly recommend reading the awesomeness that April at RoundShape just wrote on why we are fat from a historical perspective.  April [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: April D</title>
		<link>http://roundshape.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/a-historical-perspective-why-are-we-fat/#comment-5113</link>
		<dc:creator>April D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roundshape.wordpress.com/?p=692#comment-5113</guid>
		<description>Would be an interesting study indeed Sansom... hmm Though there really isn&#039;t such an increase in fat people to correlate with the amount of hype.  Taking away the BMI and working with actual weights; Americans have only gain like 5-7 pounds or so over many decades.  I need to dig out where I found that too and post it soon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be an interesting study indeed Sansom&#8230; hmm Though there really isn&#8217;t such an increase in fat people to correlate with the amount of hype.  Taking away the BMI and working with actual weights; Americans have only gain like 5-7 pounds or so over many decades.  I need to dig out where I found that too and post it soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sansom</title>
		<link>http://roundshape.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/a-historical-perspective-why-are-we-fat/#comment-5112</link>
		<dc:creator>Sansom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roundshape.wordpress.com/?p=692#comment-5112</guid>
		<description>Seems there is a direct correlation on the increase of articles on fat and the fat per capita. Looks like all there efforts on obesity works just about as well as the &#039;War On Drugs.&#039; Maybe too many cues telling us how fat we are and why we are so fat are just making us fat. Someone should do a study on that. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems there is a direct correlation on the increase of articles on fat and the fat per capita. Looks like all there efforts on obesity works just about as well as the &#8216;War On Drugs.&#8217; Maybe too many cues telling us how fat we are and why we are so fat are just making us fat. Someone should do a study on that. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: April D</title>
		<link>http://roundshape.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/a-historical-perspective-why-are-we-fat/#comment-5107</link>
		<dc:creator>April D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roundshape.wordpress.com/?p=692#comment-5107</guid>
		<description>Perhaps that many...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps that many&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wriggles</title>
		<link>http://roundshape.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/a-historical-perspective-why-are-we-fat/#comment-5106</link>
		<dc:creator>wriggles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roundshape.wordpress.com/?p=692#comment-5106</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this April it&#039;s great. 

What this shows is how useless obesity science is, the first article is from 1926, have progressed in any useful way since then? Doubt it.

Also, there does seem to me to be a shift after the 1967 one possibly you could include the 1974 one after it. But there is a distinct shift from just trying to study &#039;obesity&#039; like anything else, and the obesity crisis crusade, that centres on blaming and shaming fat people.

I feel this reflects the way things have gone.

As for what I call &#039;five minute fatties&#039; that is a generalistic term not just for those who&#039;ve put on weight later on but the attitudes they tend to have (not all the time). There does tend to be some general differences between them and those who&#039;ve put on weight earlier, not just because of the later weight gain, but often because they&#039;ve not been exposed to and therefore shaped in response to years of what it means to be fat before the brain was even fully formed.

In fact this is something I&#039;ve noted myself and yet it rarely explicitly mentioned, for example I laughed when some years ago I noticed that weight watchers kept featuring loses of 20 -30 lbs all of a sudden, when they used to feature the biggest weight loss amounts they could find.

Some of it is targetting, but quite a lot is due to who looks more &#039;successful&#039;, all permanent weight loss is probably low, but if you gained in adulthood, you&#039;re metabolism seems at least slightly more likely to adjust to dieting induced weight loss.

This reminds me of the sensitivity some less fat people have toward those who are bigger, when the latter suggest that they have to put up with a lot more than those who blend in more.

I&#039;m the latter, and I don&#039;t have a problem with acknowledging that, why would I? I feel lucky not to have to put up with some of what they have to deal with.

Furthermore, I am a fat person whose been fat since childhood, but I cannot in all conscience say that I did not eat above my set point (although I don&#039;t fully accept the theory) for one, I tried not to gain weight, &lt;i&gt; before &lt;/i&gt; I gained it, yes as a child, and since then until 7 years ago have tried to intervene to lower my weight.

I don&#039;t care if I was meant to be slim and &#039;blew it&#039;, I don&#039;t care if I caused my own weight by trying not to be fat and then trying to become slim. All of it informs what I think and gives me a perspective that is different to others as do five minute fatties, whose (sometimes) lack of auto pilot s**t eating constant apologia for being fat has helped to remind me at times that, a) I&#039;m doing it and b) that I don&#039;t have to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this April it&#8217;s great. </p>
<p>What this shows is how useless obesity science is, the first article is from 1926, have progressed in any useful way since then? Doubt it.</p>
<p>Also, there does seem to me to be a shift after the 1967 one possibly you could include the 1974 one after it. But there is a distinct shift from just trying to study &#8216;obesity&#8217; like anything else, and the obesity crisis crusade, that centres on blaming and shaming fat people.</p>
<p>I feel this reflects the way things have gone.</p>
<p>As for what I call &#8216;five minute fatties&#8217; that is a generalistic term not just for those who&#8217;ve put on weight later on but the attitudes they tend to have (not all the time). There does tend to be some general differences between them and those who&#8217;ve put on weight earlier, not just because of the later weight gain, but often because they&#8217;ve not been exposed to and therefore shaped in response to years of what it means to be fat before the brain was even fully formed.</p>
<p>In fact this is something I&#8217;ve noted myself and yet it rarely explicitly mentioned, for example I laughed when some years ago I noticed that weight watchers kept featuring loses of 20 -30 lbs all of a sudden, when they used to feature the biggest weight loss amounts they could find.</p>
<p>Some of it is targetting, but quite a lot is due to who looks more &#8217;successful&#8217;, all permanent weight loss is probably low, but if you gained in adulthood, you&#8217;re metabolism seems at least slightly more likely to adjust to dieting induced weight loss.</p>
<p>This reminds me of the sensitivity some less fat people have toward those who are bigger, when the latter suggest that they have to put up with a lot more than those who blend in more.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m the latter, and I don&#8217;t have a problem with acknowledging that, why would I? I feel lucky not to have to put up with some of what they have to deal with.</p>
<p>Furthermore, I am a fat person whose been fat since childhood, but I cannot in all conscience say that I did not eat above my set point (although I don&#8217;t fully accept the theory) for one, I tried not to gain weight, <i> before </i> I gained it, yes as a child, and since then until 7 years ago have tried to intervene to lower my weight.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care if I was meant to be slim and &#8216;blew it&#8217;, I don&#8217;t care if I caused my own weight by trying not to be fat and then trying to become slim. All of it informs what I think and gives me a perspective that is different to others as do five minute fatties, whose (sometimes) lack of auto pilot s**t eating constant apologia for being fat has helped to remind me at times that, a) I&#8217;m doing it and b) that I don&#8217;t have to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E</title>
		<link>http://roundshape.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/a-historical-perspective-why-are-we-fat/#comment-5105</link>
		<dc:creator>E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roundshape.wordpress.com/?p=692#comment-5105</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“If you want to have normal weight you can – if you are normal and have will power. …[P]atients most likely to be successful in weight reduction have the following characteristics: 5. Obesity developed in adult life rather than in childhood. 6. They have no previous history of losing weight and then putting it all back on again.”&lt;/i&gt;

So, like ... four people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“If you want to have normal weight you can – if you are normal and have will power. …[P]atients most likely to be successful in weight reduction have the following characteristics: 5. Obesity developed in adult life rather than in childhood. 6. They have no previous history of losing weight and then putting it all back on again.”</i></p>
<p>So, like &#8230; four people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ostara</title>
		<link>http://roundshape.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/a-historical-perspective-why-are-we-fat/#comment-5093</link>
		<dc:creator>Ostara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roundshape.wordpress.com/?p=692#comment-5093</guid>
		<description>No worries :) , and again, I definitely see what you&#039;re saying with the force fed mice, which is just ridiculous to base a diagnosis on to begin with. Not to mention, the important fact that you&#039;d think scientists and/or journalists would&#039;ve figured out already, people aren&#039;t mice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No worries <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  , and again, I definitely see what you&#8217;re saying with the force fed mice, which is just ridiculous to base a diagnosis on to begin with. Not to mention, the important fact that you&#8217;d think scientists and/or journalists would&#8217;ve figured out already, people aren&#8217;t mice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: April D</title>
		<link>http://roundshape.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/a-historical-perspective-why-are-we-fat/#comment-5091</link>
		<dc:creator>April D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roundshape.wordpress.com/?p=692#comment-5091</guid>
		<description>Ostara, no I think you&#039;re right and it is a good point to bring up.  Re-reading what I posted it does seem to give a hint that there is a &quot;pass&quot; for being born fat versus gaining weight with age and I really did not mean to imply such at all so I am actually glad to be called out on it.  What I was more boggled by in the studies I flipped through along the decades that continued to treat a force-fed mouse the same as ALL human fat people: reaffirming for researchers over and over that &quot;of course&quot; humans are also only fat due to the same sort of force-feeding if if we could only figure out WHY or how to STOP IT then we&#039;d all magically be &quot;normal&quot;. (As seems the latest little &quot;I&#039;m so sad you think being fat-empowered isn&#039;t going to kill you in the end&quot; troll I just deleted as spam was convinced.)  

As I&#039;ve read elsewhere though while intent is part of what  you say; far more important is how it is actually heard so again my apologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ostara, no I think you&#8217;re right and it is a good point to bring up.  Re-reading what I posted it does seem to give a hint that there is a &#8220;pass&#8221; for being born fat versus gaining weight with age and I really did not mean to imply such at all so I am actually glad to be called out on it.  What I was more boggled by in the studies I flipped through along the decades that continued to treat a force-fed mouse the same as ALL human fat people: reaffirming for researchers over and over that &#8220;of course&#8221; humans are also only fat due to the same sort of force-feeding if if we could only figure out WHY or how to STOP IT then we&#8217;d all magically be &#8220;normal&#8221;. (As seems the latest little &#8220;I&#8217;m so sad you think being fat-empowered isn&#8217;t going to kill you in the end&#8221; troll I just deleted as spam was convinced.)  </p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve read elsewhere though while intent is part of what  you say; far more important is how it is actually heard so again my apologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
